TPG’s failed 5G network: Why Australia dodged a bullet
Published 30-JAN-2019 12:21 P.M.
|
2 minute read
Hey! Looks like you have stumbled on the section of our website where we have archived articles from our old business model.
In 2019 the original founding team returned to run Next Investors, we changed our business model to only write about stocks we carefully research and are invested in for the long term.
The below articles were written under our previous business model. We have kept these articles online here for your reference.
Our new mission is to build a high performing ASX micro cap investment portfolio and share our research, analysis and investment strategy with our readers.
Click Here to View Latest Articles
Australian telco TPG (ASX:TPM) has cancelled the roll out of its planned 5G network.
In an announcement released to the ASX on Tuesday, TPG executive chairman David Teoh pointed to the Australian government's ban on Huawei equipment as the primary factor behind the decision.
“A key reason for the selection of the vendor and the design of TPG’s network was that there was a simple upgrade path to 5G, using Huawei equipment,” the announcement stated.
“In light of the Government’s announcement in late August 2018 that it would prohibit the use of Huawei equipment in 5G networks, that upgrade path has now been blocked.”
TPG had been installing Huawei equipment since April 2017.
The news is a bitter pill to swallow for tech enthusiasts (like myself) who can't wait to get their hands on 5G.
TPG had invested some $100 million into the network to date, with a further $30 million committed to the roll out of the network. 900 of the 1,500 network sites had been completely or partially completed.
Ouch.
Why Huawei got the boot
TPG's axed network seems like a huge waste, but the government had good reason to oust the Chinese company.
The August 2018 ruling saw Australia join the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand as countries to ban the ongoing installation of Huawei equipment in developing 5G networks.
The ban was the result of widespread belief that the company had been spying on behalf of the Chinese government. If if the arrest of Meng Wanzhou is anything to go by, that concern appears to be well founded.
Meng Wanzhou, the director of Huawei’s Australian subsidiary between October 2005 and August 2011, headed up the company’s corporate governance and oversaw the early foundational efforts in Australia’s NBN roll-out.
Wanzhou is since alleged to have been a key player in criminal activity for four of those years (which included a plot to defraud international banks).
She also happens to be the daughter of Huawei’s founder, Ren Zhengfei.
What the market said
While losing a new mobile network that was so close to completion is a cruel blow, allowing Huawei to become a key block in Australia's 5G future could have been a national security disaster.
The market seems to agree.
The news of one less competitor led to Telstra (ASX:TLS) finishing the day as the best performed stock on the ASX 200, closing at a three month plus high of $3.19 (up more than 7.7%).
Perhaps surprisingly, TPG also fared well.
While the company dipped to $6.60 just before 11am on Tuesday, investors likely realised that TPG had slashed its future expenditure significantly, while potentially clearing up any concerns the ACCC had about its merger with Vodafone.
As a result, they recovered and closed up 3% to $7.15.
General Information Only
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (S3, ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’) (CAR No. 433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information and is for informational purposes only. Any advice is general advice only. Any advice contained in this article does not constitute personal advice and S3 has not taken into consideration your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Please seek your own independent professional advice before making any financial investment decision. Those persons acting upon information contained in this article do so entirely at their own risk.
Conflicts of Interest Notice
S3 and its associated entities may hold investments in companies featured in its articles, including through being paid in the securities of the companies we provide commentary on. We disclose the securities held in relation to a particular company that we provide commentary on. Refer to our Disclosure Policy for information on our self-imposed trading blackouts, hold conditions and de-risking (sell conditions) which seek to mitigate against any potential conflicts of interest.
Publication Notice and Disclaimer
The information contained in this article is current as at the publication date. At the time of publishing, the information contained in this article is based on sources which are available in the public domain that we consider to be reliable, and our own analysis of those sources. The views of the author may not reflect the views of the AFSL holder. Any decision by you to purchase securities in the companies featured in this article should be done so after you have sought your own independent professional advice regarding this information and made your own inquiries as to the validity of any information in this article.
Any forward-looking statements contained in this article are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results or performance of companies featured to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this article. S3 cannot and does not give any assurance that the results or performance expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this article will actually occur and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
This article may include references to our past investing performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of our future investing performance.
