Banking culture change: more than ping-pong and pizza
Published 11-OCT-2016 08:55 A.M.
|
2 minute read
Hey! Looks like you have stumbled on the section of our website where we have archived articles from our old business model.
In 2019 the original founding team returned to run Next Investors, we changed our business model to only write about stocks we carefully research and are invested in for the long term.
The below articles were written under our previous business model. We have kept these articles online here for your reference.
Our new mission is to build a high performing ASX micro cap investment portfolio and share our research, analysis and investment strategy with our readers.
Click Here to View Latest Articles
The banking inquiry has put the culture of banks into the spotlight and provided unequivocal proof culture drives financial performance – but not how you might think, says Marcus Crow, co-founder at 10,000 Hours.
With the regulator muscling in on the inner workings of banking and financial institutions, it is evident that bad culture drives financial performance down.
Fines, sanctions, enforceable undertakings and many more financial penalties and reputational losses, which take money and business away from banking organisations, would provide proof that culture is inextricably linked to financial performance.
“Regulators have no interest in ping-pong tables, pizza day or height-adjustable desks,” says 10 Hours co-founder Marcus Crow.
“Questions like how well does your institution detect and remove poor behaviour? shows regulators are looking beyond whether there is a positive culture in banks. They want to know how problematic conduct is surfaced and prevented. This is about the disclosure and candour colleagues are able to create between themselves in real time with real issues.
“However, if a middle manager is going to be able to surface a shonky deal or decision to a leader two or three levels higher in the organisation they need the interpersonal muscle to do it. This requires better training and coaching on how to deal with complexity and uncertainty. It’s not something that will be fixed by creating a ‘pleasant working atmosphere’. It’s challenging these leaders and their colleagues everyday on the issues that test moral fibre and leadership mettle. It’s about understanding how to navigate the complexities of these issues, stay with knotty conflict long enough to arrive through to a workable outcome for all stakeholders.
Crow says the lessons from this inquiry for all businesses, not just banks, is: as well as equipping your leaders with yoga classes at lunchtime, consider also building in them the strength and stamina to raise the heat on prickly issues that might save you a ban, a fine, or a nasty front-page story.
“The cause of culture does effect financial performance – just not in the direction we have been looking. And we are witnessing the banks experiencing that right now.”
– Marcus Crow is co-founder at 10,000 Hours, a firm specialising in helping leaders work in uncertainty.
General Information Only
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (S3, ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’) (CAR No. 433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information and is for informational purposes only. Any advice is general advice only. Any advice contained in this article does not constitute personal advice and S3 has not taken into consideration your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Please seek your own independent professional advice before making any financial investment decision. Those persons acting upon information contained in this article do so entirely at their own risk.
Conflicts of Interest Notice
S3 and its associated entities may hold investments in companies featured in its articles, including through being paid in the securities of the companies we provide commentary on. We disclose the securities held in relation to a particular company that we provide commentary on. Refer to our Disclosure Policy for information on our self-imposed trading blackouts, hold conditions and de-risking (sell conditions) which seek to mitigate against any potential conflicts of interest.
Publication Notice and Disclaimer
The information contained in this article is current as at the publication date. At the time of publishing, the information contained in this article is based on sources which are available in the public domain that we consider to be reliable, and our own analysis of those sources. The views of the author may not reflect the views of the AFSL holder. Any decision by you to purchase securities in the companies featured in this article should be done so after you have sought your own independent professional advice regarding this information and made your own inquiries as to the validity of any information in this article.
Any forward-looking statements contained in this article are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results or performance of companies featured to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this article. S3 cannot and does not give any assurance that the results or performance expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this article will actually occur and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
This article may include references to our past investing performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of our future investing performance.