The evolution of the lifestyle business
Published 10-AUG-2017 12:41 P.M.
4 minute read
Hey! Looks like you have stumbled on the section of our website where we have archived articles from our old business model.
In 2019 the original founding team returned to run Next Investors, we changed our business model to only write about stocks we carefully research and are invested in for the long term.
The below articles were written under our previous business model. We have kept these articles online here for your reference.
Our new mission is to build a high performing ASX micro cap investment portfolio and share our research, analysis and investment strategy with our readers.
Click Here to View Latest Articles
When it comes to the idea of a lifestyle business, an image of corporate decadence springs to mind. Perhaps company owners who use business funds (read: hard-earned shareholder dollars) to fuel an opulent lifestyle of yacht purchases, Vanuatu beach-lounging, and champagne business lunches.
At the core of this old-school cliché is the suggestion that a lifestyle business is one which is geared towards supporting the owners’ income and personal requirements rather than maximising revenue.
The term itself can also be patronising. It tends to be used by big businesses and investors to describe business owners who aren’t willing to pursue growth, at the expense of their products or services or the happiness of their employees.
But if the shifting implications of the term is anything to go by, this is a tired and limiting way to frame the modern lifestyle business.
Taking a different approach
More pragmatically, the lifestyle business could simply be seen as one where founders or owners live off cash flow rather than trying to increase equity value for themselves and investors, while keeping an eye on an eventual exit.
The guiding principle? To create and sustain a particular level of income for its owners. Nothing more.
And while there’s nothing inherently wrong with this, it could explain why the lifestyle business is frequently regarded with condescension, especially in the investment space.
One blogger looks at the term from the perspective of venture capitalists, who often use “lifestyle business” as a derogatory catchall to dismiss entrepreneurs who aren’t on track to generate big enough exit returns to warrant investment.
Lifestyle businesses also tend to be self-limiting in their ability to expand. Dave Clarke, co-founder of startup funding resource, FundingSage, maintains that lifestyle businesses “tend to be focused on one or more key persons, the loss of whom will stop the company in its tracks”.
While this is also true of most startup companies in their infancy, Clarke claims a lifestyle company never overcomes that limitation. Generally, this means that such companies have a difficult time surviving their original owners. As such, they are often not scalable.
But what if we shifted the focus to the concerns and interests of the entrepreneur themselves?
On the rise is a particular breed of lifestyle business where the owner’s primary objective is the fulfilment of a non-financial personal passion – or, rather, where this passion supersedes a desire to accumulate personal wealth.
From this central idea emerges an increasingly visible culture of “lifestyle entrepreneurs”.
The ‘lifestyle entrepreneur’, or How I learned to stop worrying and love my job
The term “lifestyle entrepreneur” seems to have been coined in 1987 by William Wetzel, a director emeritus of the Centre for Venture Research at the University of New Hampshire.
Wetzel used it then to describe ventures unlikely to generate economic returns sufficiently hefty to interest outside investors, which isn’t dissimilar to the definition explored earlier that makes the idea so unappealing to venture capitalists.
“In financial jargon, there’s no upside potential for creating wealth,” he said.
But today, the lifestyle entrepreneur can be seen more as a business owner who is neither a financially independent hobbyist nor a wealth-seeking empire-builder. Rather, for Wetzel, “Lifestyle ventures are usually ventures that are run by people who like being their own bosses. But they’re in it for the income as well.”
Thus, the lifestyle entrepreneur has a different understanding of success than those predominantly chasing wealth.
When capital is not enough
For this kind of lifestyle entrepreneur, a business that generates only capital isn’t enough – the owner wants things like freedom from corporate bureaucracy and the ability to make decisions autonomously.
Rather than simply being self-employed, a lifestyle entrepreneur is all about working in a way that sustains the lifestyle they want. This might mean being able to travel the world or have more time to spend with family.
Also appealing to the lifestyle entrepreneur is geographic flexibility; the ability to live and work in a chosen location whether it’s a cottage in the country, a cafe, or from home.
There are also the benefits of avoiding the grind of daily commuting, or more flexible schedules, and the possibility of being able to do something you feel strongly about. Although these bonuses don’t always apply, they certainly become more possible.
What’s most interesting about the lifestyle entrepreneur is the fact that their passions and interests are leveraged and monetised to create income. This new breed of business owner is emerging at a time when society is rethinking work/life balance.
Perhaps society is now catching up with what these entrepreneurs already know, as we fundamentally revise the relationship between work and play, and adopt an increasingly dim view of the 9-5 productivity metric.
General Information Only
S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (S3, ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’) (CAR No. 433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information and is for informational purposes only. Any advice is general advice only. Any advice contained in this article does not constitute personal advice and S3 has not taken into consideration your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Please seek your own independent professional advice before making any financial investment decision. Those persons acting upon information contained in this article do so entirely at their own risk.
Conflicts of Interest Notice
S3 and its associated entities may hold investments in companies featured in its articles, including through being paid in the securities of the companies we provide commentary on. We disclose the securities held in relation to a particular company that we provide commentary on. Refer to our Disclosure Policy for information on our self-imposed trading blackouts, hold conditions and de-risking (sell conditions) which seek to mitigate against any potential conflicts of interest.
Publication Notice and Disclaimer
The information contained in this article is current as at the publication date. At the time of publishing, the information contained in this article is based on sources which are available in the public domain that we consider to be reliable, and our own analysis of those sources. The views of the author may not reflect the views of the AFSL holder. Any decision by you to purchase securities in the companies featured in this article should be done so after you have sought your own independent professional advice regarding this information and made your own inquiries as to the validity of any information in this article.
Any forward-looking statements contained in this article are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results or performance of companies featured to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this article. S3 cannot and does not give any assurance that the results or performance expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this article will actually occur and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
This article may include references to our past investing performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of our future investing performance.