Next Investors logo grey

Does big business inhibit innovation?

Published 25-NOV-2015 14:22 P.M.


3 minute read

Hey! Looks like you have stumbled on the section of our website where we have archived articles from our old business model.

In 2019 the original founding team returned to run Next Investors, we changed our business model to only write about stocks we carefully research and are invested in for the long term.

The below articles were written under our previous business model. We have kept these articles online here for your reference.

Our new mission is to build a high performing ASX micro cap investment portfolio and share our research, analysis and investment strategy with our readers.

Click Here to View Latest Articles

Following the release of the Competition Policy Review (otherwise known as the Harper Review) in March, the Federal government has delayed the implementation of changes to section 46 regarding misuse of market power.

Headed up by respected Australian economist Ian Harper, the report makes recommendations for sweeping changes across the taxi, retail and transport industries.

Peter Strong, CEO of Council of Small Business Australia (COSBOA), stated, “We are very pleased to see the major recommendations from the Harper Review back in the limelight where they belong.

“It is pertinent that we focus on developing competition in aged care, human services, intellectual property, roads and other key areas. However, it is of course disappointing that several dominant companies have created enough confusion and fear that we have to delay the important changes needed to Section 46.

“The fact is that the biggest companies Australia has ever seen and their union, the Shop Distributive and Allied Employees’ Association (SDA), use their influence and resources to control competition policy to the detriment of productivity, retail diversity and innovation,” said Mr Strong.

The Turnbull government has in fact accepted most of the recommendations, however it has held back on Section 46, citing an inconclusive definition of the term ‘harmful competition’.

Instead a discussion paper will be released with comments due by 12 February and considered in Cabinet by March.

The sticking point seems to be the recommendation to remove restrictions on pharmacy ownership and location rules.

Speaking more broadly about Section 46 Mr Strong said, “When two major companies have such far reaching influence on producers and manufacturers, innovation is stifled. COSBOA knows this and this is why the changes in Section 46 are vital to ensure we do not develop similar damaging domination in other areas, such as aged care.

It is COSBOA’s job to fight for small business and they feel they have been railroaded by the Business Council of Australia.

“We know that the Business Council of Australia and several of its members, particularly WesFarmers, will now, to the detriment of Australia, attempt to ramp up their lobbying and secret manipulations to get their way. Fortunately we have been assured by the government that all discussions will be open and the decisions will be made with competition, innovation and choice in mind as the outcome,” Mr Strong said.

“COSBOA and its members have said for decades that the current state of competition is unfair and the dominant businesses are killing innovation. Ignored for years, we were finally proven right in 2014 when the ACCC successfully prosecuted Coles for unconscionable conduct towards its suppliers. This is why we need to be heard – to ensure the same thing does not ever happen again. Our innovators need space to do their stuff.”

Overall the changes have been welcomed.

Professor Harper told Fairfax Media that he was happy with the government’s response.

The Retail Council was pleased the government would pursue retail trading hour reform and remove parallel import restrictions and Infrastructure Partnerships Australia said it was the first public commitment by government to fix road and rail transport.

Meanwhile Jennifer Westacott, Business Council Chief Executive said, “The national competition reforms of the 1990s left Australia a more competitive and stronger economy, delivering robust real wages growth and a sustained lift in productivity. The comprehensive reform agenda announced by the Treasurer today has the potential to do the same.”

General Information Only

S3 Consortium Pty Ltd (S3, ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’) (CAR No. 433913) is a corporate authorised representative of LeMessurier Securities Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 296877). The information contained in this article is general information and is for informational purposes only. Any advice is general advice only. Any advice contained in this article does not constitute personal advice and S3 has not taken into consideration your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Please seek your own independent professional advice before making any financial investment decision. Those persons acting upon information contained in this article do so entirely at their own risk.

Conflicts of Interest Notice

S3 and its associated entities may hold investments in companies featured in its articles, including through being paid in the securities of the companies we provide commentary on. We disclose the securities held in relation to a particular company that we provide commentary on. Refer to our Disclosure Policy for information on our self-imposed trading blackouts, hold conditions and de-risking (sell conditions) which seek to mitigate against any potential conflicts of interest.

Publication Notice and Disclaimer

The information contained in this article is current as at the publication date. At the time of publishing, the information contained in this article is based on sources which are available in the public domain that we consider to be reliable, and our own analysis of those sources. The views of the author may not reflect the views of the AFSL holder. Any decision by you to purchase securities in the companies featured in this article should be done so after you have sought your own independent professional advice regarding this information and made your own inquiries as to the validity of any information in this article.

Any forward-looking statements contained in this article are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results or performance of companies featured to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this article. S3 cannot and does not give any assurance that the results or performance expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this article will actually occur and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

This article may include references to our past investing performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of our future investing performance.